www.visionfromfeeling.com
 
HomeMemberlistSearchFAQRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 Next Test

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
VisionFromFeeling

avatar

: A third test soon!
Posts : 19
Appreciation : 0

PostSubject: Next Test   Tue May 11, 2010 10:09 pm

This has gone on long enough. I've experienced my claim for thirteen years now, and been investigating it for nearly three. The IIG test did not provide a sufficiently conclusive ending for me. It being a two-stage process, of first identifying the person in which I sense an imbalance due to a missing kidney, and to then determine the side in which a kidney is missing, the results I had (also available here) are comparable to a 3.8% chance of guessing. Well below the 5% mark traditionally used in science to signify something that is entitled to further consideration.

Another interesting factor is, that had I discarded the portions of my answers during the test, that I felt beforehand and before the results were established, would be wrong, and only submitted the answers that I was tremendously confident in before the results were established, I would have acchieved 100% accuracy. This is not post-rationalization, ad hoc, or statements made after the fact. I clearly expressed what was either my utter disbelief or tremendous confidence in each of the answers, during the test and before the results were in. Further allowing for more testing.

Certainly, the IIG test does not support this claim being headed toward verification, and I do expect to falsify this claim. It just hasn't happened yet to my satisfaction as the primary, and hopefully not biased or blind from the lack of distance from self, skeptical investigator of this claim.

All that is needed, is for me to have a medical perception that does represent what the claim tries to do, and to find that this perception is incorrect. Simple as that. Make a statement based on the attempted performance of this claim. And be wrong. Why are we not there yet?

I have not made an incorrect statement of a health perception that I would state represents the claim. This naturally excludes for instance my inaccuracy in trial 3 of the IIG test, in which I was exhausted and had to guess on the side in which the kidney was missing, and was wrong. Fortunately I wrote down this excuse clearly and many times in my draft papers at the test, and handing them in with my answer sheet, making this a perfectly valid excuse to make. We are testing the accuracy of the perceptions when they do occur, not the endurance of the claimant in producing perceptions trial after trial to the point of exhaustion. Weighing in to my own decision to continue with investigation, are also my own personal anecdotal experiences with interesting cases of accuracy with the claim. Being anecdotal and undocumented, they can not be held as formal evidence, but they do compel me to continue.

So I am now arranging another test. Parts of this test will only be revealed after the test has taken place and once its results have been established and documented.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.visionfromfeeling.com/
VisionFromFeeling

avatar

: A third test soon!
Posts : 19
Appreciation : 0

PostSubject: Re: Next Test   Tue May 11, 2010 10:47 pm


  • The test is expected to take place in June 2010. May be delayed, but hopefully should not be.
  • The test involves readings with Skeptics as the volunteers, and/or other volunteers not necessarily Skeptics, in which case overseen by Skeptics and ensuring non-Skeptic volunteers not find out what my health impressions of them were. That way volunteers can not be harmed by potentially inaccurate health information.
  • My impressions are recorded in writing.
  • Skeptics, other than me, collect my answers and compare to the health information provided by the volunteer, and are responsible for determining the accuracy of my impressions.
  • The test involves "open readings", in which any health information may be recorded by me. Some of which may be vague or subjective in nature, or not possible to check for accuracy, in which case it is disregarded in evaluation of the accuracy.
  • If volunteers who are missing a kidney or a uterus are available, they may be involved in a selection test where I am asked to pick them from a group of several persons.
  • The original documentation of the test remains with the Skeptics and not with the claimant. The claimant may be given copies if possible.
  • The Skeptics are asked to present the results and documentation of the test and doing so independently of the claimants involvement.
  • Regardless of any extent of verified accuracy, this test can not prove or verify the claim that is tested, as sufficient reliability in testing procedure can not be guaranteed despite best attempts of ensuring the integrity of the test.
  • The test is capable of concluding on the claim as falsified. The exact criteria for falsification of the claim can not be defined at this point at least, since the exact test design has not been predetermined yet.
  • Any excuses made by the claimant must be made on the answer sheets and any excuses made after a reading has been submitted can not be considered, as there is no way to prove that they are not made after the fact.
  • The test may be video recorded to facilitate documentation, and so that if there are any issues one can refer back to the video for clarification.
  • To protect the integrity of the test, the participating Skeptics are not allowed to reveal their involvement or our plans until after the test has taken place and the results have been established.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.visionfromfeeling.com/
VisionFromFeeling

avatar

: A third test soon!
Posts : 19
Appreciation : 0

PostSubject: Re: Next Test   Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:49 pm

This test, intended over the summer of 2010, ended up not happening, because in its place the 2010 demonstration is taking place.
2010 Demonstration VFF Forum
2010 Demonstration VFF website
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.visionfromfeeling.com/
VisionFromFeeling

avatar

: A third test soon!
Posts : 19
Appreciation : 0

PostSubject: Re: Next Test   Sat Jun 26, 2010 4:24 am

wardenclyffe writes:
Quote :
I don't know how I missed what VfF posted a couple of days ago. Her
planned test for the summer of 2010 has been cancelled because it's been
replaced with a "demonstration." If she starts calling it a "Live
Challenge Event," then we'll know for sure.

Ward
How could you miss it?! What is wrong with you?

VFF

By the way I find it strange that not one person has contacted me with a question regarding the TAM controversy. Of course I would have an answer to that question, but, since no one has asked. I do think they enjoy the controversy, so I won't take it away from them by answering a question no one has asked me.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.visionfromfeeling.com/
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Next Test   

Back to top Go down
 
Next Test
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» New DNA Test for DU or Agent Orange Exposure
» Calls to DNA test "Madeleine McCann in Cyprus
» DNA Test for girl in India who looks like Madeleine (2011)
» What personality are you? | 16Personalities test
» The McCanns and The Polygraph

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Vision From Feeling :: Vision From Feeling Forum :: Vision From Feeling Forum-
Jump to: